International Law in Brief


International Law in Brief (ILIB) is a forum that provides updates on current developments in international law from the editors of ASIL's International Legal Materials.
| By: Adom Malcolm Cooper : January 10, 2014 |

On December 24, 2013, the United Nations Security Council, acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, issued a resolution authorizing the increase of the United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan (UNMISS) of “up to 12,500 troops of all ranks and of a police component, including the appropriate Formed Police Units, of up to 1,323.” The Security Council expressed “grave alarm and concern regarding the rapidly deteriorating security and humanitarian crisis in South Sudan resulting from the political dispute and subsequent violence caused by the country’s political...


| By: Steven Arrigg Koh : January 10, 2014 |

On December 19, 2013, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) condemned the forced transfer of Djamel Ameziane on December 5, 2013, from the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay to Algeria.  According to the press release, “[t]he United States carried out this transfer against Djamel Ameziane’s will and in violation of international human rights law” given that he was reportedly secretly imprisoned by Algerian authorities until December 16, 2013, and that Luxembourg and other countries had extended offers for Ameziane to settle in their respective territories.  The...


| By: Steven Arrigg Koh : January 10, 2014 |

On December 18, 2013, the Arbitral Tribunal constituted in the matter of the Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between Bangladesh and India concluded its hearing on the merits at the Peace Palace in The Hague.  According to the press release, the Parties “presented their positions on certain key issues relating to the maritime boundary between the two States, including the location of the land boundary terminus between them, the delimitation of the Territorial Sea, the Exclusive Economic Zone, and the Continental Shelf within and beyond 200 nm.”  The Tribunal has since...


| By: Steven Arrigg Koh : January 10, 2014 |

On December 17, 2013, Timor-Leste instituted proceedings against Australia at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding Australian agents’ seizure and subsequent detention “of documents, data and other property which belongs to Timor-Leste and/or which Timor-Leste has the right to protect under international law.”  According to the press release, Timor-Leste also filed a request for the indication of provisional measures in order to “protect its rights and to prevent the use of seized documents and data by Australia against the interests and rights of Timor-Leste in the pending...


| By: Steven Arrigg Koh : January 10, 2014 |

On December 16, 2013, the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda delivered a judgment in the Prosecutor v. Grégoire Ndahimana case.  According to the press release, the Appeals Chamber “set[] aside some of the Trial Chamber’s findings and increas[ed] the sentence of 15 years of imprisonment imposed on Mr. Ndahimana by the Trial Chamber to a sentence of 25 years of imprisonment.”  The Appeals Chamber affirmed Ndahimana’s convictions for genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity “for failing to punish his subordinates from the Kivumu communal...


| By: Adom Malcolm Cooper : January 10, 2014 |

On December 16, 2013, a new international criminal justice research tool was released online, tailored specifically to the jurisprudence produced by the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). According to the press release, the ICTR/ICTY Case Law Database (CLD) includes “almost 1,800 entries, covering pronouncement on the elements of statutory crimes, modes of liability, and other issues,” and it “[...] expounds the pioneering case law produced by the two tribunals...


| By: Adom Malcolm Cooper : January 10, 2014 |

On December 11, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Lozano v. Alvarez, a case arising out of issues regarding “equitable tolling” under Article 12 of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Article 12 of the Convention requires that an abducted child be returned if the other parent files a petition for the child’s return within one year of the abduction. Thus, Article 12 ensures that the abducting parent not benefit from the laws of the nation to which he or she has abducted the child. Should the left-behind...


| By: Steven Arrigg Koh : January 10, 2014 |

On December 13, 2013, Trial Chamber III of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, according to the press release, unanimously ordered that the proceedings in the Prosecutor v. Šešelj case “would resume from the point after the closing arguments, and move into the deliberations phase as soon as Judge Niang has familiarized himself with the file.”  The Chamber ruled that “a new judge is able to assess witness testimony given in his absence through other means, including video recordings,” and therefore that “Judge Niang will be . . . able to evaluate the...


| By: Steven Arrigg Koh : January 10, 2014 |

On December 12, 2013, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court filed an application requesting the adjournment of the provisional trial date in the Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta case.  According to the press release, the Prosecutor encountered problems with key witnesses and thus concluded that her case “does not satisfy the high evidentiary standards required at trial.”  The Prosecutor further stated that she “need[s] time to complete efforts to obtain additional evidence” and consider whether the evidence meets such standards.  She also stated that the “decision...


| By: Adom Malcolm Cooper : January 07, 2014 |

In Burlington v. Ecuador, a dispute arising out of two production-sharing contracts, the Chairman of the Administrative Council of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) upheld a proposal to disqualify Professor Orrego Vicuña according to Arbitration Rule 9(1), which provides that “a party proposing the disqualification of an arbitrator pursuant to Article 57 of the Convention [. . .] promptly, and in any event before the proceeding is declared closed, file its proposal with the Secretary-General, stating its reasons therefore.” The Chairman found...