On August 18, 2020, the Special Tribunal for Lebanon pronounced its judgment (see also a summary of the judgment) in Ayyash et al. The case concerned the February 14, 2005, attack against the former Prime Minister of Lebanon, Rafik Hariri who, along with 21 others, was killed by explosives. The Trial Chamber unanimously found the accused, Salim Jamil Ayyash, guilty of five offenses, including conspiracy to commit a terrorist act and the intentional homicide of Mr. Hariri. The other three accused persons were found not guilty. According to a press release from the Tribunal, the Trial...
International Law in Brief
International Law in Brief (ILIB) is a forum that provides updates on current developments in international law from the editors of ASIL's International Legal Materials.
A joint press statement has been issued by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross, and the European Commissioner for Justice, Didier Reynders, on the initiation of a discussion on how to enhance the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU in Schrems II (covered previously in ILIB) on July 16 of this year, which declared the framework invalid. The statement reads:
The European Union and the United States recognize the vital importance of data protection and the significance of cross-border data...
On August 5, 2020, the Plenary of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court voted in favor of an injunction that requires “the federal government to adopt measures to contain the spread of Covid-19 in the indigenous communities.” The Federal Supreme Court website lists the measures included in the injunction: “the creation of sanitary barriers and a situation room, the removal of invaders and the presentation of a confrontation plan.” The purpose of the sanitary barrier is to ensure isolation of indigenous people in order to prevent further spread; the purpose of the situation room is to ensure...
On July 23, 2020, Australia submitted a letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations stating its position regarding China and the South China Sea. The submission states that, “[t]he Australian Government rejects any claims by China that are inconsistent with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).” The submission refers to and disputes several arguments made by China in previous submissions. Regarding “China’s claim to ‘historic rights’ or ‘maritime rights and interests’” Australia reiterates that “[t]he Tribunal in the 2016 South China Sea Arbitral...
The UN Refugee Agency has published a Good Practice Paper on Statelessness Determination Procedures, as part of a greater initiative to publish a series of such papers to assist states and achieve its goal of ending statelessness by 2024. The paper provides an overview of existing statelessness determination procedures, noting that “[o]nly about twenty States worldwide have established dedicated [statelessness determination procedures” and that several states, including the United States, pledged in 2011 to establish procedures. Following that overview, the Paper goes into detail on key...
On July 22, 2020, lawyers for Kathleen O’Donnell filed a claim in the Federal Court of Australia against The Commonwealth of Australia, the Secretary to the Department of Treasury, and the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Office of Financial Management. According to the notice, Ms. O’Donnell contends that climate change will have an appreciable impact on Australia and therefore financial products that its government offers on the Australian Securities Exchange; consequently, “an investor is entitled to be informed of those risks.” By not including this information on “Information...
On July 16, 2020 the European Court of Justice released its judgment in Schrems II regarding the Privacy Shield agreement between the United States and the European Union; the judgment relied on analyses of the Standard Contractual Clauses Decision (SCC Decision), the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and the Commission’s 2016 Privacy Shield Decision. It was in response to a request from the High Court for a preliminary ruling; the original complaint was brought in 2013 by Mr. Max Schrems and “requested … that Facebook Ireland be prohibited from transferring his personal...