Comments
On January 30, 2015, the England and Wales Court of Appeal issued a judgment in GS, EO, GM, & Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department confirming that the deportation of foreign nationals suffering from serious diseases for which they could not receive healthcare in their home states was not a breach of Article 3 (prohibition against inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment) or Article 8 (capacity to form and enjoy relationships and the right to privacy) of the European Convention of Human Rights. Five of the six appellants— nationals of India, Ghana, Jamaica, and the Democratic Republic of Congo— suffered from terminal renal failure and one from advanced HIV infection. The Court reasoned that “in such cases the alleged future harm would emanate not from the intentional acts or omissions of public authorities or non-State bodies, but instead from a naturally occurring illness and the lack of sufficient resources to deal with it in the receiving country” and concluded that only in the most exceptional cases where the “humanitarian grounds against the removal are compelling,” such as in D v. U.K., could removal constitute a breach. The Court did not consider the Article 8 claims in three of the cases, remitted one for reconsideration, and found the facts in the last two insufficient to sustain a claim under the article.