Use of Force, and International Humanitarian Law

The Writ Stops Here: No Habeas for Prisoners Held by U.S. Forces in Afghanistan

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
14
Issue: 
13
Author: 
Faiza Patel
PDF Version: 
Image: 

The First Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
14
Issue: 
11
Author: 
David Kaye
PDF Version: 
Image: 

Supreme Court Preview: The Samantar Case and the Immunity of Foreign Government Officials

Introduction

The 1976 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) provides the exclusive framework for deciding when foreign governments are entitled to immunity from suit in U.S. courts. [1] Over the years, the Supreme Court has played an integral role in interpreting the statute. This week, the Court once again faces the task of resolving a fundamental question about the FSIA's scope.

Topic: 
Volume: 
14
Issue: 
6
Author: 
David P. Stewart
PDF Version: 
Image: 
Organizations of Note: 

The ICC Appeals Chamber Decision on the Warrant of Arrest in Prosecutor v. Bashir

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
14
Issue: 
4
Author: 
Saira Mohamed
PDF Version: 
Image: 

The ICC Appeals Chamber Judgment on the Legal Characterization of the Facts in Prosecutor v. Lubanga

I. Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
14
Issue: 
1
Author: 
Amy Senier
PDF Version: 
Image: 

The Khmer Rouge Tribunal Paves the Way for Additional Investigations

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
23
Author: 
Neha Jain
PDF Version: 
Image: 

Germany Sues Italy at the International Court of Justice on Foreign Sovereign Immunity – Legal Underpinnings and Implications for U.S. Law

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
22
Author: 
Ronald J. Bettauer
PDF Version: 
Image: 
Organizations of Note: 

The European Court of Justice Kadi Decision and the Future of UN Counterterrorism Sanctions

Introduction

The UN Security Council’s use of “targeted sanctions” against suspected terrorists – an important counter-terrorism tool designed to immobilize assets and limit travel – has come under increasing challenge by regional and national courts.[1] The challenge is simple: the sanctioning of a person amounts to the imposition of a penalty, yet the normal due process afforded alleged criminals does not apply.

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
20
Author: 
Peter Fromuth
PDF Version: 
Image: 

Who can be detained in the "War on Terror"? The Emerging Answer

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
18
Author: 
Faiza Patel
PDF Version: 
Image: 

Honduras: ¿Golpe de Estado en Vestido Constitucional? - Revisión*

* This version has been revised to reflect the 2003 repeal of Article 205(15) of the Honduran Constitution.  See endnote 44.  The author is indebted to Mr. Frank Walsh for bringing this oversight to his attention.

Presentación

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
9
Author: 
Doug Cassel
Image: