International Business Transactions

The WTO Seal Products Dispute: A Preview of the Key Legal Issues

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
14
Issue: 
2
Author: 
Simon Lester
PDF Version: 
Image: 
Organizations of Note: 

Chinese Import Restrictions on Publications and Entertainment Products Found to be WTO Inconsistent

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
19
Author: 
Brendan McGivern
PDF Version: 
Image: 
Organizations of Note: 

Wiwa v. Shell: The $15.5 Million Settlement

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
14
Author: 
Ingrid Wuerth
PDF Version: 
Image: 

Global Witness v. Afrimex Ltd.: Decision Applying OECD Guidelines on Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights

On August 28, 2008, the United Kingdom’s National Contact Point (UK-NCP) issued its decision in Global Witness v. Afrimex Ltd.[1] In this case, Global Witness, a non-governmental organization,[2] alleged that Afrimex Ltd.

Topic: 
Volume: 
13
Issue: 
1
Author: 
Jernej Letnar Cernic
Image: 

ICSID Tribunal Finds Tanzania To Have Violated Bilateral Investment Treaty But Declines To Award Any Damages

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
12
Issue: 
27
Author: 
Andrea K. Bjorklund
Image: 

WTO Appellate Body Upholds Compliance Panel's Findings in Cotton Subsidies Dispute

I. Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
12
Issue: 
19
Author: 
Karen Halverson Cross
Image: 

The 2008 Ruggie Report: A Framework for Business and Human Rights

The United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises,[1] John Ruggie, submitted his final Report to the Human Rights Council on June 3, 2008.[2] The Report and its attendant documents

Topic: 
Volume: 
12
Issue: 
12
Author: 
Christiana Ochoa
Image: 

Hall Street Assocs. v. Mattel, Inc.: Supreme Court Denies Enforcement of Agreement to Expand the Grounds for Vacatur Under the Federal Arbitration Act

On March 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court announced its judgment in Hall Street Assocs. v. Mattel, Inc.,[1] a case involving the exclusivity of the grounds for vacating arbitral awards under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). As explained below, the decision holds that the disputing parties may not agree to expand the grounds for vacatur beyond those listed in 9 U.S.C. § 10.

Topic: 
Volume: 
12
Issue: 
11
Author: 
Charles H. Brower, II
Image: 
Organizations of Note: 

The WTO Gambling Dispute: Antigua Mulls Retaliation as the U.S. Negotiates Withdrawal of its GATS Commitments

Introduction

Topic: 
Volume: 
12
Issue: 
5
Author: 
Simon Lester
Image: 

A WTO Panel Openly Rejects the Appellate Body's "Zeroing" Case Law

Topic: 
Volume: 
12
Issue: 
3
Author: 
Sungjoon Cho
Image: