Topic 1
WTO Law and the Right to Regulate: China – Rare Earths
On March 26, 2014, a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel issued its report on a dispute between the European Union, Japan and the United States as complainants and China as respondent over access to so-called ârare earths,â as well as tungsten and molybdenum.[1] The Panel found that China violated its obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT)[2] and the Accession Protocol[3] by
Australia v. Japan: ICJ Halts Antarctic Whaling
On March 31, 2014, the International Court of Justice declared that Japan must halt its current whaling program in the Southern Ocean.[1] The decision will not affect Japanâs whale hunt in the northern Pacific and it does not foreclose Japan from all whaling in the future, as long as it is conducted within the requirements of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW).[2] Nor does this decision affect the other two nations that currently conduct wh
Reviewing the Agudas Chasidei Chabad v. Russian Federation, et al. Dispute
Introduction
United States v. Windsor and its Progeny: Implications for U.S. Bilateral and Multilateral Engagement
Introduction
The Timor Sea Treaty Arbitration: Timor-Leste Challenges Australian Espionage and Seizure of Documents
Introduction and Background
Substantive New Normative Provisions on Women and Armed Conflict Concurrently Adopted by the United Nations Security Council and the CEDAW Committee
Introduction
The EU-Faroe Islands Herring Stock Dispute at the WTO: the Environmental Justification
Introduction
International Court of Justice Defines Maritime Boundary Between Peru and Chile
Introduction
Animal Welfare, Public Morals and Trade: the WTO Panel Report in EC – Seal Products
On November 25, 2013, a panel established under the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization (WTO) issued its report in the EC – Seal Products dispute.[1] The decision arose from complaints by Canada and Norway against a legislative scheme adopted by the European Union (EU) in 2009 to prohibit the importation and marketing of seal products (the EU Seal Regime).[2] On January 24, 2014, Canada and Norway filed to appeal the panel's decision; the